Peer Evaluation Tools
Through peer evaluation, students can learn by reviewing the work of other students, by receiving peer comments on their own work, and by writing a self-reflection on a completed assignment. For instructors, group member evaluation can provide insights into a team’s internal performance and production. These tools can be administered anonymously or showing student names.
Feature | Feedback Fruits |
Canvas |
Primary Considerations | ||
Separate deadline for the project submission and a separate deadline for the peer review | ✔️ | |
Able to assign reviews using Canvas groups | ✔️ | |
Multiple options to release peer reviews: –Manually / Automatically –Immediately / Never / After a specific date |
✔️ | |
Allow students to write a self-reflection on the received peer reviews | ✔️ | |
Allow students to write a self-assessment on their own submission, which is the same rubric that is used for the assignment | ✔️ | |
Secondary Considerations | ||
Automatic peer selection can be contained by sections | ✔️ | ✔️ |
Allow students who didn’t hand in an assignment to review other students | ✔️ | ✔️* |
Ability for instructor and reviewer to annotate directly on student submission | ✔️ | |
Allow for different types of student feedback, such as rubrics and comments | ✔️ | ✔️ |
Option to give grades based on instructor-determined criteria, such as: –Student participation and completeness –Average scores from peer ratings |
✔️ | |
Teacher can assign a grade to the original submission | ** | ✔️ |
Options for double-blind student anonymity and no student anonymity | ✔️ | ✔️ |
Option for anonymous reviewer who knows the identity of the submitter or anonymous submitter who knows the identity of the reviewer | ✔️ | |
Clear, multi-step process for Teacher (set-up) and students (giving feedback) | ✔️ | |
“Copy from existing” | ✔️ | ✔️ |
Automatic release of peer reviews as soon as review is complete | ✔️ | ✔️ |
*Must be assigned manually. ** Grading can be done within Canvas as an additional assignment. |